<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>NASP: School Psychology Review</title>
<link>http://www.nasponline.org/publications/spr/sprmain.aspx</link>
<description>School Psychology Review</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 National Association of School Psychologists</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sept 2009 10:15:00 EDT</lastBuildDate>

    <item>
        <title>A Comparison of Group-Oriented Contingencies and
            Randomized Reinforcers to Improve Homework
            Completion and Accuracy for Students With Disabilities</title>
        <link>http://www.nasponline.org/publications/spr/spr383index.aspx</link>
        <description>
            The present study employed an alternating-treatments design to compare
            the differential effect of group contingencies on the improvement of homework
            completion and accuracy of students with disabilities in a self-contained
            fifth-grade classroom. Generally, past investigations have indicated a positive
            association between homework performance and academic achievement. Relative
            to their nondisabled peers, students with learning disabilities are more at risk for
            homework problems. Thus, homework assignments are particularly important for
            students with disabilities to reinforce learning and improve academic achievement.
            The results suggested that all group contingencies were effective in enhancing
            overall completion and accuracy, with no substantial differences evidenced
            by one contingency in particular.
        </description>
        <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sept 2009 10:15:00 EDT</pubDate>
    </item>
<item>
    <title>Self-Management of On-Task Homework Behavior:
        A Promising Strategy for Adolescents With Attention
        and Behavior Problems</title>
    <link>http://www.nasponline.org/publications/spr/spr383index.aspx</link>
    <description>
        Students with attention and behavior problems oftentimes experience
        difficulty finishing academic work. On-task behavior is frequently cited as a primary
        reason for students’ failure to complete homework assignments. Researchers have
        identified self-monitoring and self-management of on-task behavior as effective tools
        for improving homework completion rates among students who experience difficulty
        attending to tasks. The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of a
        30-min naturalistic, home-based, self-management intervention for students with
        attention problems and behavioral disorders. Specifically, the current study set out to
        investigate differences in on-task behavior between baseline and intervention when
        self-monitoring intervals were set at 3 and 10 min. For all participants, on-task
        behavior improved significantly over baseline. Furthermore, the improvements in
        on-task behavior were evident for both the 3- and 10-min intervals, suggesting that
        shorter intervals did not enhance the intervention’s effectiveness. Finally, based on
        school records, the frequency of completed homework assignments increased.
    </description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sept 2009 10:15:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
    <item>
        <title>Validity of Three School Climate Scales to Assess
            Bullying, Aggressive Attitudes, and Help Seeking</title>
        <link>http://www.nasponline.org/publications/spr/spr383index.aspx</link>
        <description>The School Climate Bullying Survey (Cornell &amp; Sheras, 2003) is a
            self-report survey used to measure attitudes and behaviors associated with school
            bullying. Two studies were conducted to examine the valid use of its three school
            climate scales: (a) Prevalence of Teasing and Bullying, (b) Aggressive Attitudes,
            and (c) Willingness to Seek Help. In Study 1, exploratory and confirmatory factor
            analyses were performed with a sample of 2,111 students from four middle
            schools and established reasonable fit for 20 items with their hypothesized scales.
            Multigroup confirmatory factor analyses revealed good overall model fit. In
            Study 2, regression analyses using school-level measures aggregated from 7,318
            ninth-grade students attending 291 Virginia public high schools indicated that the
            three scales were related to meaningful criteria for school disorder.</description>
        <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sept 2009 10:15:00 EDT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>
            Standardized Observational Assessment of Attention Deficit
            Hyperactivity Disorder Combined and Predominantly
            Inattentive Subtypes. II. Classroom Observations
        </title>
        <link>http://www.nasponline.org/publications/spr/spr383index.aspx</link>
        <description>Trained classroom observers used the Direct Observation Form (DOF;
            McConaughy &amp; Achenbach, 2009) to rate observations of 163 6- to 11-year-old
            children in their school classrooms. Participants were assigned to four groups based
            on a parent diagnostic interview and parent and teacher rating scales: Attention Deficit
            Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)-Combined type (n = 64); ADHD—Inattentive
            type (n = 22); clinically referred without ADHD (n = 51); and nonreferred control
            children (n=26). The ADHD—Combined group scored significantly higher than the
            referred without ADHD group and controls on the DOF Intrusive and Oppositional
            syndromes, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Problems scale, Hyperactivity-Impulsivity
            subscale, and Total Problems; and significantly lower on the DOF On-Task score.
            The ADHD—Inattentive group scored significantly higher than controls on the DOF
            Sluggish Cognitive Tempo and Attention Problems syndromes, Inattention subscale,
            and Total Problems; and significantly lower on the DOF On-Task score. Implications
            are discussed regarding the discriminative validity of standardized classroom observations
            for identifying children with ADHD and differentiating between the two
            ADHD subtypes.</description>
        <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sept 2009 10:15:00 EDT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Generalizability of Classroom Behavior Problem and
            On-Task Scores From the Direct Observation Form
</title>
        <link>http://www.nasponline.org/publications/spr/spr383index.aspx</link>
        <description>
            The present study used generalizability theory to investigate the dependability
            of systematic observations of students’ problem behavior and on-task behavior
            in classrooms. The Direct Observation Form (McConaughy &amp; Achenbach, 2009) was
            used with a sample of 24, 6- to-11-year-old children attending 18 different elementary
            schools. The participants were referred because of concerns about learning and
            behavioral problems. All students were observed on eight occasions in the morning
            and afternoon across four different days. Generalizability analyses revealed important
            differences in observed variance and the number of observations required to obtain
            acceptable dependability across different behavioral dimensions. Results are discussed
            in terms of their implications for future research and practice.
        </description>
        <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sept 2009 10:15:00 EDT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Sensitivity to Growth Over Time of the Preschool
            Numeracy Indicators With a Sample of Preschoolers in
            Head Start
        </title>
        <link>http://www.nasponline.org/publications/spr/spr383index.aspx</link>
        <description>
            There has been increased attention to the development of measures for
            assessing mathematical skill and knowledge in young children. Most of the
            evidence supporting these measures is consistent with Stage 1 research in the
            development of progress monitoring measures (Fuchs, 2004) and consists of
            investigation of technical features of performance at one point in time. The
            purpose of the current study was to move into Stage 2 research and examine
            sensitivity to growth over time of the Preschool Numeracy Indicators (PNIs;
            Floyd, Hojnoski, &amp; Key, 2006) in a sample of Head Start preschoolers through a
            longitudinal design. Results indicated the PNI Oral Counting Fluency, One-to-
            One Correspondence Counting Fluency, Number Naming Fluency, and Quantity
            Comparison Fluency task scores are sensitive to growth over time and provide
            preliminary support for the promise of such measures in assessing early mathematical
            skill development. Consideration is given to implications for assessing
            early mathematical skill development in the context of general outcome measurement.
        </description>
        <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sept 2009 10:15:00 EDT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>
            Oral Reading Fluency as a Predictor of Reading
            Comprehension With American Indian and White
            Elementary Students
        </title>
        <link>http://www.nasponline.org/publications/spr/spr383index.aspx</link>
        <description>
            The use of curriculum-based measures for the purpose of school-wide
            screening and progress monitoring of reading within school reform processes has
            been discussed extensively in the literature over the past several years. Little has been
            done, however, in terms of evaluating the predictive bias of these measures across
            ethnic groups, particularly with the American Indian student. The purpose of this
            study was to evaluate the predictive validity of oral reading fluency on a state measure
            of adequate yearly progress between White and American Indian third-grade students.
            The results suggested oral reading fluency is a robust predictor of reading comprehension
            across both cohorts, although significant differences were noted within the
            separate predictive models. Discussion regarding the implications of these findings
            within school-based decision making is undertaken.
        </description>
        <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sept 2009 10:15:00 EDT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>
            Interspersal Technique and Behavioral Momentum for
            Reading Word Lists
        </title>
        <link>http://www.nasponline.org/publications/spr/spr383index.aspx</link>
        <description>
            Academic tasks that include easy responses increase the probability that
            less preferred and/or more challenging tasks will be performed. The current study
            applied the process of arranging easier stimuli within reading word lists with
            behavioral momentum and an interspersal technique. We hypothesized that the
            behavioral momentum condition, which placed a series of easier words at the
            beginning of a reading word list task, would result in greater reading fluency for
            word lists, and that the interspersal condition, which interspersed easier words
            into a word list, would result in higher fluency for the target words. Fourth-grade
            students (n = 97) were randomly assigned to the behavior momentum, interspersal,
            or control condition. The results indicated that the participants assigned
            to the behavioral momentum condition read significantly more words correctly
            per minute than the participants assigned to the control condition (d = .70). No
            statistically significant differences were observed between the remaining conditions.
        </description>
        <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sept 2009 10:15:00 EDT</pubDate>
    </item>

</channel>
</rss>
